PS

Friday, October 31, 2008

Legislating From the Bench vs. Preaching From the White House

I hear a lot of Christians talking about how they are against judges legislating from the bench (especially in this current presidential election year). Often, this topic is brought up in reference to Supreme Court judges upholding a woman’s right to choose. My response is this: How about we also have no preaching from the white house or the houses of congress? Why would a person vote for someone who would legislate what everyone in a country can or cannot do based on one religion?

If I recall my world history correctly, Christians weren’t very fond of state regulated controls on them in favor of the Roman state religion. What makes Christians think that anyone else would like state regulated controls on their life in favor of Christianity?

Additionally, does Jesus really want people to be forced to follow his teachings? Or do you think he may prefer people to follow him of their own will? Also, isn’t it God’s job to save the souls of everyone? Perhaps we should leave the saving up to him and simply be nice to our neighbors and love them the way they are.

Let’s do this… let’s keep politics to things that are truly important to a society such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and safety. Let’s leave each person to worry about themselves in the arena of morals and religion.

1 Comments:

  • Do we live in the same country? I haven't seen much preaching from the pulpit. Reagan was a Christian but was pretty quiet about it. Pretty much any president so far has had some sort of faith and not a lot of legislation has come from it. The only think I know of Bush doing was holding back the tide of ebryionic cell research but he could only do that for as long as he was in power. Roe V. Wade has stood for 30+ years.
    I guess the one thing that makes Christians (at least ones that really read the Bible and take it seriously) stand out is that they believe in absolute truth and there is right and there is wrong. Part of society's job is to stick up for what's right and forbid what is wrong. We have become a humanistic society that believes in relative truth. That really confuses me. Last I checked, 1+1=2 and you can't make it equal anything else. Also if you say that gravity doesn't exist and then jump off a skyscraper it won't help you fly. Gravity and mathmatics are absolute truths. Why all of a sudden do they not exist elsewhere?
    You illuded to the founding fathers. One thing that is sad is how the whole "separation of church and state" has gotten out of control. Did you know that that specific term doesn't even exist in the first amendment? The goal of the first amendment was to keep one denomination from becoming the sanctioned church of the land. That was a huge deal since ever since catholicism, each region would choose their "brand" of Christianity and persecute all the others. The first amendment just gave each of the churches autonomy to do their thing. The founding fathers had an expectation that the country would be founded on the 10 commandments etc.
    Hope I don't sound huffy... I don't feel that way but I know attitude is hard to convey in writing.

    By Blogger Cari, At November 18, 2008 at 2:41 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]



<< Home